Search for "for" to add a manager or member.
The results offer "deforge" before "forget". It would be more judicious if he proposed first the for* in alphabetical order then the for in alphabetical order on the surnames, then the same thing on the first names
Currently we decide to always offer an alphabetical order since we cannot rely on the usermanager order... so it would be $$$ to do it (considering we also have lazy loading)